AI’s Energy Crunch: Can Grids Keep Pace?

As AI booms, power demand becomes a policy issue

Artificial intelligence is moving from labs to daily life. Chatbots draft emails. Image tools design ads. Algorithms optimize logistics. But the surge has a cost: rising demand for electricity and water. Utilities, chipmakers, and policymakers are now racing to manage the strain. The debate is not only about innovation. It is also about infrastructure.

Data centers already consume a significant share of global power. AI workloads are pushing that higher. The International Energy Agency (IEA) warned in 2024 that "Electricity consumption from data centres, artificial intelligence and cryptocurrencies could double by 2026." That projection has become a reference point for grid planners and regulators.

The numbers behind the growth

Training and running large AI models requires specialized chips and dense computing clusters. These systems draw a lot of power and generate heat. They also need cooling, often using water or advanced liquid systems. Industry disclosures point to the trend. Major cloud providers reported double-digit increases in water use in 2022 compared with 2021. They cited new AI capacity as a factor. Analysts expect demand to keep rising as more companies deploy AI at scale.

At the same time, AI’s economic promise is large. A 2023 report by the McKinsey Global Institute estimated that generative AI could add the equivalent of "$2.6 trillion to $4.4 trillion" annually to the global economy. That upside helps explain the rush to expand data center footprints, from North America to Europe and Asia.

Why AI needs so much power

  • Training vs. inference: Training a frontier model can take weeks on thousands of GPUs. That is a one-time cost per model, but it is huge. Inference, which is the process of answering user queries, happens all the time. As adoption spreads, inference becomes the dominant driver of ongoing power use.
  • Specialized hardware: Graphics processing units (GPUs) and AI accelerators deliver high performance. They also draw significant power, especially when densely packed.
  • Cooling: Heat removal is essential to keep systems reliable. Air cooling is common. Liquid cooling is growing. Both add to total energy and water needs, depending on design and location.
  • Network and storage: Moving and storing data also uses energy. High-speed networks and solid-state storage improve efficiency but are not free.

Industry bets on efficiency

Chipmakers and cloud providers say efficiency gains will slow the growth in energy per unit of AI output. New architectures and software can deliver more compute per watt. Hardware vendors have announced next-generation platforms designed to cut energy per training run and per inference.

  • Smarter models: Techniques like model pruning, quantization, and sparsity reduce the work needed to get the same answer. Smaller models tailored to tasks can replace giant general-purpose systems in many cases.
  • Better scheduling: Data centers can shift some workloads to off-peak hours. They can use demand-response programs to support grid stability.
  • Clean power sourcing: Hyperscalers sign long-term contracts for wind, solar, and storage. Some are exploring onsite generation, grid-scale batteries, and heat reuse for nearby buildings.
  • Liquid cooling: Direct-to-chip liquid cooling improves thermal performance and can lower total energy overhead in dense AI clusters.

Even with these steps, the absolute load may grow fast. That is because demand for AI services is growing faster than efficiency is improving. Utilities in several regions report new data center requests measured in gigawatts.

Communities weigh the trade-offs

Local officials must decide where and how to host new facilities. Data centers bring construction and tax revenue. They also need land, water, and reliable transmission. In some places, residents worry about noise, truck traffic, or stress on local aquifers. In others, leaders see AI as a way to attract investment and jobs.

Experts say early planning helps. Grid upgrades can take years. Permitting timelines vary. Sites near existing substations or transmission corridors are easier to connect. Cooler climates and access to non-potable water can ease cooling constraints. But conditions differ widely by region.

Rules and guidance are taking shape

Governments are moving on two tracks: how AI is used, and how it is built. In 2024, the European Union adopted the AI Act, a risk-based law that bans certain "unacceptable risk" applications and imposes obligations on "high-risk" systems. While the Act focuses on safety and rights, it will also influence the design and deployment of AI infrastructure.

In the United States, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published the AI Risk Management Framework in 2023. It sets out core functions—"Govern, Map, Measure, Manage"—to guide organizations. The OECD’s AI Principles, endorsed by dozens of countries, state that "AI systems should be robust, secure and safe throughout their entire lifecycle and potential risks should be continually assessed and managed." These norms will shape corporate practices, including transparency about impacts on people and the environment.

What critics and supporters say

  • Critics warn that unchecked growth could strain grids, raise power prices, and slow climate goals. They point to regions where data center demand is outpacing transmission build-out.
  • Supporters argue AI can accelerate efficiency across the economy. They cite use cases in power forecasting, industrial automation, and building management that cut emissions more than AI adds.
  • Neutral observers say both can be true. AI’s footprint depends on model choices, data center design, and the carbon intensity of local grids.

What to watch next

  • Grid capacity: Transmission projects, interconnection queues, and utility resource plans. Timelines here will determine where AI clusters can grow.
  • Efficiency metrics: Standard ways to report energy per training run and per inference. PUE (power usage effectiveness) is common, but AI-specific measures are emerging.
  • Water stewardship: Use of non-potable water, recycling, and site selection in water-stressed regions. Clear reporting builds trust.
  • Renewables and storage: New power purchase agreements, 24/7 carbon-free energy commitments, and grid-scale battery deployments linked to AI campuses.
  • Model design: The shift from a few giant models to many specialized ones. This could lower the average cost per task.

The bottom line

The AI race is now also an infrastructure race. The technology’s benefits are real. So are its resource needs. The IEA’s warning about possible doubling of data center, AI, and crypto power use by 2026 is a clear signal. Planning, transparency, and efficiency will decide whether the grid can keep pace.

For policymakers, the task is to align innovation with reliability and climate goals. For industry, it is to deliver more capability with less energy and water. For communities, it is to weigh local impacts and benefits. None of these choices are simple. But the trade-offs are now squarely on the public agenda—and they are arriving faster than many expected.

MOST POPULAR